Category Archives: Transparencia


Response to Odebrecht consortium’s demand for an additional 700 million dollars to complete the Punta Catalina coal plants that are two years behind.
Public Statement,
Monday, August 28,2017,
Santo Domingo, D. N.
The only option the government has before Odebrecht after it confessed last December that it bribed public officials in the Dominican Republic with $92 million dollars between 2001 and 2014 is the application of Law 340-06 on Public Contracting.
Articles 11,14,36,65 and 66 of this law provide for the termination of contracts of companies that commit acts of corruption or are related thereto, and the lifelong disqualification of their status as contractors or bidders of the Dominican State,”without liability to the contracting entity” (Article 66.4).
If Odebrecht has had the audacity to demand an additional 700 million dollars from the government of Danilo Medina to complete the construction of the Punta Catalina coal plants now with a two-year delay, it is because the country is being held hostage by this transnational company and victim of its own corruption, a participant and accomplice in the corruption of this company that turned the country into an international money laundering center and a brothel for national and foreign officials.
It is impossible to believe in the government’s refusal to comply with Odebrecht’s demand and not to think that this refusal will be nothing more than feeble bargaining for the consumption of advertising of an unavoidable payment that will come from the citizen’s ribs.
The government, instead of applying the Public Contracts Law, concluded an approved agreement between the Attorney General’s Office and Odebrecht, with the purpose of protecting it from criminal prosecution of its crime of corruption, maintained the contracts of this company, especially Punta Catalina, and has continued to give it millions of dollars for this work, as if nothing had happened.
Danilo Medina preferred to lose around 300 million dollars pending disbursement of the European bank pool loan and to issue 500 million sovereign bonds, before abandoning his relations with Odebrecht, whose corrupt practice in the Punta Catalina project is the cause of the decision of these banks.
The complicity story with Odebrecht in Punta Catalina began with a fixed bidding process to favor it and sending a contract that violated the terms of reference of this bidding process to to the National Congress, diluting the turnkey nature of this contract, incorporating a cost escalation clause, No. 9.1. and assigning an exemption of all types of taxes through clause 12.1.3.
This pairing between the government and Odebrecht continued when this company was unable to meet its contractual commitments because of its corrupt behavior.
Danilo Medina and his government, instead of denouncing and annulling the contract for breach, covered the lack of financing from the National Bank for Economic and Social Development of Brazil (BNDES), with domestic resources.
They did not care about violating the Constitution of the Republic and the national budget law to allocate a large part of the savings from the Oil Tax for the construction of Punta Catalina and seriously endanger the stability of the Bano de Reservas with loans that did not comply with any legal requirement, in order to settle commitments with local contractors and suppliers of this work.
If Dominican workers’ pension funds were spared from this predatory attack to raise funds to be invested in Punta Catalina, it was due to opposition from European banks, especially the shareholders’ meeting of the French bank Société Genérale, who threatened to withdraw their financing in the event that the government spent $600 million of these funds on this project. In Europe, it is forbidden for pension funds to be used in the construction of coal plants and other investments related to this fossil fuels.
Odebrecht’s demand for more money, in addition to dramatically exposing the government’s vulnerability to this company to the public, has confirmed the denunciations that the final cost of this project would far exceed the contract price and has denied that Punta Catalina’s construction is at a level of 70% of its schedule.
These two additional disclosures, the additional cost overrun on the contract price and the delay in the work schedule, leave no arguments to those who oppose an independent audit of this project and a new tender on the basis of natural gas.
The overvaluation of Punta Catalina is not limited to these new additional 700 million dollars claimed by Odebrecht. An audit is necessary to accurately quantify the overvaluation existing to date for the construction of Punta Catalina, in order to demand its reimbursement and to prosecute the culprits and beneficiaries of this overvaluation.
If the government implements the Public Contracts Law, it would not have to comply with Odebrecht’s demand for an additional 700 million dollars in payment and could open a new bidding process based on natural gas to conclude Punta Catalina before 2020 and at a lower cost than the total cost stipulated by Odebrecht for these coal plants.
The great benefit of converting Punta Catalina’s natural gas is to avoid the very serious contamination from coal and a considerable amount of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere.
The National Committee to Combat Climate Change, CNLCC, reiterates once again the application of Law 340-06 on Public Contracting to Odebrecht, for which reason this company must be immediately expelled from the country.
Likewise, an independent audit of the overvaluation of Punta Catalina and the call for a new bidding process based on natural gas to complete the construction of this project.
It is a demand that we made with the knowledge that the authorities’ complicity with Odebrecht’s corruption prevents it from being satisfied, not because it is impossible, but because of the permanence in power of a government as guilty as this company, of the corruption committed in Punta Catalina.


Press release,
Thursday, December 29, 2016,
Santo Domingo, D.N.

This morning, the National Committee Against Climate Change, CNLCC, demanded, through delivery of a communication to the General Directorate of Public Contracts, that it rescind the contract of Punta Catalina and the other contracts of Odebrecht and that this company be permanently barred as a contractor of the Dominican State.

The Committee also demanded from the General Directorate of Public Contracts, as the Governing Body of the System of Contracting of Goods, Works, Services and Concessions, to open an exhaustive investigation to determine which of the public officials that received the 92 million dollars that Odebrecht confessed to having paid in bribes to obtain the contracts for various infrastructures in the country, the exact amounts of the overvaluations of these works and other illicit actions which have yet to be determined.

It also requested that these officials be punished in relation to the seriousness of the offenses committed in the framework of Law 340-06 of Public Procurement, without prejudice to the civil and criminal responsibilities of these officials, that these be heard by the courts of the Republic.

It stated that articles 35 and 36 of Law 340-06 give the General Directorate of Public Procurement, as the Governing Body, to supervise compliance with the rules, principles, policies and regulations governing public procurement and to know the wrongdoings and to establish the sanctions corresponding to the bidders and the officials who participated in the purchases, acquisitions and in the public concessions of the the central and decentralized government entities.

It pointed out that as a result of Odebrecht’s admission that it had paid $ 92 million to Dominican public officials between 2001 and 2014 in order to obtain public works contracts, these must be rescinded because of their unlawful genesis as indicated in article 11 of Law 340-06 of Public Contracts.

The Committee attached to its correspondence the original and official document signed by representatives of Odebrecht and by US judicial officials signed on December 21 before the New York State Court of Justice, where Odebrecht confesses to making payments of bribes for $ 788 million dollars in 12 countries, including the Dominican Republic with $ 92 million, the third largest recipient of illicit funds in this group of countries.

It stated that paragraph III of article 66 of Law 340-06 of Public Procurement cites as one of the grounds for permanently barring a company as a supplier, contractor and / or supplier of the State to “offer donations, commissions or royalties to officials of public entities, directly or through third party in relation to acts related to the tender procedure, or when they use staff of these institutions to prepare their proposals. “

This is precisely what Odebrecht has admitted to judicial officials in Brazil, Switzerland and the United States, and to world public opinion.

It indicated that article 14 of Law 340-06 prohibits that persons and companies that have been condemned for corruption or are being litigants for this cause be bidders of the State.

“This permanent disqualification from Odebrecht as a contractor and / or supplier for the Dominican State, this is also supported by the undisputed fact that the president of this company, Marcelo Odebrecht, was convicted by the Brazilian Justice, through a an nonrevocable sentence in which he was tried for corruption and sentenced to 19 years and four months of prison “, affirms the Committee in its missive.

It also points out that “57 other Odebrecht senior managers, including the directors of this company in the Dominican Republic, have admitted to the Brazilian Justice, their responsibilities in serious corruption actions”.

In the letter, the CNLCC summoned the director general of Public Procurement, Yokasta Guzmán to apply strictly Law 340-06. This legislation “provides sufficient and effective tools to ensure that, as the head of the Governing Body, we implement the measures we request in this communication,” he said.

“We hope you do not compromise yourself based on the dimensions of corruption committed by Odebrecht against the interests of the people of the Dominican Republic, but on the contrary, it is an incentive for strict compliance with the Law and the responsibilities assigned to you by this legislation.” Concludes the Committee’s letter.


Photo Caption:

At the moment when members of the National Committee to Combat Climate Change, CNLCC, offered statements to the press this morning at the entrance of the General Directorate of Public Procurement. Enrique de León was the spokesman for the entity.

edebrech-licitacion-02 odebrech-licitacion-01 odebrech-licitacion-3

The INSAPROMA Community

INSAPROMA cuenta con una comunidad de personas que trabajan, se divierten juntos y hacen que el INSAPROMA sea posible. Miles de personas cada año participan en la comunidad INSAPROMA, y esperamos que usted sea uno de ellos.

Personas con todo tipo de habilidades, de todos los niveles y de todo el mundo son bienvenidos a unirse y participar en la familia. Si usted tiene algún interés por la protección del Medio Ambiente en el INSAPROMA hay maneras para que usted pueda participar y contribuir.

Budget Execution for the months January-December 2009

Instituto de Abogados para la Protección del Medio Ambiente


Decreto No.1024 de fecha 15 de octubre del 2001

Ejecución Presupuestaria de los meses Enero- Diciembre 2009

Haga clic en el siguiente enlace para ver el documento en formato PDF:

Haga clic en el siguiente enlace para ver el documento en formato PDF:

Resumen Ejecucion Presupuestaria 2009 .

2011 budget execution

Ejecución presupuestaria 2011

Haga clic en el siguiente enlace para ver el documento en formato PDF:

Haga clic en el siguiente enlace para ver el documento en formato PDF: